The #GagOrder of #PresseKodex12.1 is the mother of our wrong world view and ideology.

REPORTS ON CRIMES When reporting crimes, it is not permissible to refer to the suspect‘s religious, ethnic or other minority membership […] such references could stir up prejudices against minorities. [GUIDELINE 12.1. by the German Press Council],[obeyed USA, world wide, generalized]

The social acceptance of mandatory lies (by omission) has thrown our social and political sciences into dark ages. In spite of commitment to scientific method& and statistical rigor, even our psychology research results are patently wrong1, for lack of scientific honesty2. Postmodernist 3 ideological quack sciences like gender studies, critical race studies, and parts of sociology and anthropology prosper under the shield of compulsory Multi-Level data omission4 – and could not survive the onslaught of #TrueSpeech and #TruthRevolution.

It’s forbidden to divulge true facts like: “Pakistani Muslims raped white children”! Such  #TrueSpeech about minority crime is forbidden. This anti-racist taboo resulted in 15 years of sexual slavery, gang rapes, torture, murder, and forced prostitution, for 1400 mostly white underage girls in Rotherham 5*6 *7 *8 alone 9.

To prevent rape, murder 10,  a #TruthRevolution is needed with civil disobedience of immoral gag orders. We must stop deceiving the electorate11.

#PresseKodex12.1 gag order analyzed

REPORTS ON CRIMES When reporting crimes, it is not permissible to refer to the suspect‘s religious, ethnic or other minority membership […] such references could stir up prejudices against minorities. [GUIDELINE 12.1. by the German Press Council],

Generalized and extended versions are obeyed in the USA, and world wide. PresseKodex 12.1 has wide ranging implications

  1. Fighting prejudices is important.
    1. The TRUTH causes prejudice
  2. Immature voter needs to be deceived
    1. Knowing the truth about minority crime causes prejudice in the immature voter
    2. Lying to the voter is socially acceptable! Even worse, lying is required and virtuous!
    3. The voting citizen cannot be trusted with the truth.
    4. The electorate is immature and intellectually deficient and will develop prejudices if told the truth
  3. Broadened Generalization:
    1. Forbidden to mention negative facts about “minorities”, to avoid stirring up prejudices[12] [13]
    2. IQ research, crime statistics, all cause racist “prejudice” and thus need to be covered up
  4. This opens the door to further lying as virtuous fight against prejudice
    1. Speaking badly about Whites is just one step further to fight prejudice
    2. Hoaxes and narratives help to fight prejudices

Avoiding prejudice is more important than safety of naïve people. People must not be warned to avoid unsafe, crime-prone “minority” neighborhoods, groups or individuals.


  1. Psychology findings all wrong:
    Dogmatical ignorance of genetics is the main reason, followed by finagling results until they conform to PC beliefs.

    Nurture Assumption Judith Rich Harris
    The Nurture Assumption by Judith Rich Harris devastatingly shows: All of social science research is wrong, because they tacitly that only nurture counts, there is no genetic inborn hereditary behavior component.

  2. Scientific Honesty & integrity compromised by PC Antiracist dogma
    Truthfulness in science should be an iron law, not a vague aspiration. One’s personal faith must not interfere with the pursuit of truth;

  3. Postmodernism: Denial of Facts and of Objective Reality is Insincere

  4. Multi-Level coverup – Compounded repression

    Victims of minority criminals under-report, police hesitate to investigate and to report minority criminals to media, media downplay, ignore, hide minority crime. Knowledge of police …Read More »

  5. Rotherham|4R

  6. Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal|Wikipedia

    … the “biggest child protection scandal in UK history”.[9] Evidence of the abuse was first noted in the early 1990s, when care home managers investigated reports that children in their care were being picked up by taxi drivers.[10] From at least 2001, multiple reports passed names of alleged perpetrators, several from one family, to the police and Rotherham Council. The first group conviction took place in 2010, when five British-Pakistani men were convicted of sexual offences against girls aged 12–16.[11] From January 2011 Andrew Norfolk of The Times pressed the issue, reporting in 2012 that the abuse in the town was widespread, and that the police and council had known about it for over ten years.[a]

  7. The Times articles, along with the 2012 trial of the Rochdale child sex abuse ring, prompted the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee to conduct hearings.[14] Following this and further articles from Norfolk, Rotherham Council commissioned an independent inquiry led by Professor Alexis Jay. In August 2014 the Jay report concluded that an estimated 1,400 children, most of them white girls,[15] had been sexually abused in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013 by predominantly British-Pakistani men (Kurdish and Kosovan men were also involved).[16][13]British Asian girls in Rotherham also suffered abuse, but a fear of shame and dishonour made them reluctant to report the abuse to authorities.[17] A “common thread” was that taxi drivers had been picking the children up for sex from care homes and schools.[b] The abuse included gang rape, forcing children to watch rape, dousing them with petrol and threatening to set them on fire, threatening to rape their mothers and younger sisters, and trafficking them to other towns.[20] There were pregnancies—one at age 12—terminations, miscarriages, babies raised by their mothers, and babies removed, causing further trauma.[21][22][23][24]

  8. The failure to address the abuse was attributed to a combination of factors revolving around race, class and gender—contemptuous and sexist attitudes toward the mostly working-class victims; fear that the perpetrators’ ethnicity would trigger allegations of racism and damage community relations; the Labour council’s reluctance to challenge a Labour-voting ethnic minority; lack of a child-centred focus; a desire to protect the town’s reputation; and lack of training and resources.[25][26][8]

  9. See Telford,/ Finland,/ Sweden,/ Colognes New Years sexual assaults
    • Racism” saves lives:
      Crime rates increase because highly efficient police strategies get outlawed (“Stop and frisk”, racial profiling)
    • Black Lives Matter to “Racists
      Anti-Racist policies increase the Black death toll because they are based on false PC quack science. Tried and proven police tactics like “stop and frisk” are outlawed as racist.

  10. Black Homicide rates Censored, deleted statistics:
    US government censors actually removed existing statistics pages from the web. We put them back.